An oft-argued chicken-or-egg debate in local horse racing, pondering who is most important — promoter, owner, or breeder, especially the more ridiculous suggestions of professional groups to include jockeys, trainers, and grooms — lends itself to the basis of exactly why, locally, the sport has evolved to being ‘niche’.It is a head-on-the-block guarantee that approximately eight of 10 horsemen will swear blindly, backed by robust arguments, that either owner or breeder constitutes the most important group in horse racing.It only requires a slight juxtaposition to expose how ridiculous any such thought may be. To suggest anybody but the punter is the single-most important person in modern horse racing would be tantamount to believing guests are not the lifeblood of the hospitality industry.Wagering on horse racing dates back to the Roman Empire when spectators would place bets on chariot races in arenas such as the Colosseum. Britain is rightly recognised as the home of organised racing through King James I, who, in the 17th century, conceptualised Newmarket, which remains the hub and official home of British racing and breeding.Through the British, who invaded and booted the Spanish in 1655, Jamaica not only had racetracks in almost every parish, hosting grand racemeets but also became renowned for producing top-class horses, which were exported to Britain and Central America.Therefore, Jamaica’s love affair with horse racing did not start as being ‘niche’. Over time, the same horsemen, through their belief that they are the most important cog in the wheel, are the very ones who have since created a closed-user group, exiling bettors in too many ways to count.First, let’s take a close look at the 2026 FIFA World Cup and the fascination of the average Jamaican, outside of who would be considered ‘niche’ fans. Never before in the history of Jamaica has interest in the World Cup reached the levels it did for 2026.Media, of course, played its role in having every Dick, Tom, Harry, and, most important, Jane, suddenly become football experts without quite understanding the game itself. However, what they understood was that whoever scored the most goals won the game. Full stop.JustBet, Supreme Ventures Group’s sports-betting entity, reported a million bets being placed throughout the tournament, not $1 million worth of bets, a million wagers placed, which could translate to hundreds of millions of dollars.What this resonates is that simplicity sells and that gambling should not be difficult when it is certainly not a necessity. How does this relate to horse racing? In Britain, horse racing ranks among the top-10 most popular sports. In the United States, horse racing comes in at 44th, on a list of 50, under (guess what?) ‘niche spectator and hobby sports’.What similar trait does local racing, once rooted in the British system of racing — ranked eighth among the UK’s most popular sports — share with North American racing, a ‘niche spectator and hobby sport ’?One of the most common arguments against North American racing is that the public understands squat, nada, nothing, which would entice widescale participation and betting, hence the primary reason why unlike the UK, where it is taxes levied on racing that supplements the industry, Canada and the United States have to survive on non-horse racing revenues, ‘other businesses’, from casinos, slot machines virtual-racing terminals and racinos (racetracks with casinos).A sport that should thrive on betting cannot be made difficult to understand. Even the casual lottery-ticket purchaser has a method to his or her madness.Any literate Jamaican should be able to pick up a raceform with a glossary, and within an hour, be able to understand, with minimal tutoring, what should be one of the three best bets in a horse-racing event.North America, with its structure of ‘independent’ states, each with its own laws outside of federal, after centuries, has only, since 2020, established a national body, the Horseracing Integrity and Safety Authority, to “enforce the first uniform, national safety and anti-doping rules for thoroughbred racing”.North America has never sought to make horse racing easy to understand by the common man. First, there were no legitimate bookmakers to popularise the sport in North America.What passed as classification of horses, which should be a guide for bettors, was a system (claiming and conditions) instead devised for horsemen (not punters) to rotate their horses among what were hundreds of racetracks, each with differing prize-money levels while attaching a monetary value to each horse as its capability of winning a race.Jamaica, a country with one racetrack, adopted that system in 1993, splintering what was probably 1,200 or 1,300 racehorses - formerly categorised in a system of A1 being the highest group and F its lowest - into as many as 21 different categories.Under the British system of A to F (simple ABC), each horse’s performance was rated after every race run. They either lost or picked up additional weight, which, if exceeding the maximum or going below the minimum allowable, would result in promotion or demotion, respectively, to the next higher or lower class.These adjusted weights (ratings) would be published no more than two days after each racemeet, informing horsemen of exactly what weights and class their horses were rated to next compete, leaving only the task of distance and preferred jockey for connections to decide while keeping punters equally abreast and informed.What is happening now under North America’s claiming and conditions system, devised for a jurisdiction with thousands of horses and hundreds of racetracks, is that local horsemen, themselves, do not understand squat, having to consult with the racing office at Caymanas Park to ascertain in which races their horses are eligible to compete.If horsemen themselves don’t understand the system within which they are racing horses, what of punters, outside of ‘niche’, who should be betting on these horses?