That the vi­o­lent/racist state­ment al­leged­ly made by Star Sab­ga that Prime Min­is­ter Kam­la Per­sad-Bisses­sar is a stink­ing c****e who should re­ceive a bul­let to her head has not been de­nied by the lawyers de­fend­ing her is re­veal­ing. It sim­ply means they, in­clud­ing Sab­ga, have all ac­cept­ed she made that state­ment.

It ap­pears that they are all al­lud­ing that she en­joys the con­sti­tu­tion­al right of free­dom of speech in ref­er­ence to the Prime Min­is­ter as a “stink­ing c****e who should re­ceive a bul­let to her head.” Hence, no apol­o­gy is forth­com­ing on be­half of their client but rather the ar­gu­ment that she was an old frus­trat­ed woman sim­ply rant­i­ng and rav­ing.

I am ut­ter­ly sur­prised that Se­nior Coun­sel Rishi Dass did not of­fer an apol­o­gy on be­half of his client in open court. But then again, Se­nior Coun­sel Dass can on­ly act on the in­struc­tion of his client.